Methodology & Sources

Jayen Consulting is committed to publishing content that is accurate, responsible, and transparent. This page explains how we research, evaluate, and present information, as well as the types of sources we rely on when producing articles, guides, and educational content.

Our goal is to support public awareness, digital safety, and informed decision-making through good-faith research and analysis.

1. Purpose of Our Content

Content published on https://jayen-consulting.com is intended for:

• General informational and educational purposes

• Consumer awareness and risk education

• Digital safety and fraud-prevention understanding

Our articles are not accusations, legal determinations, or findings of wrongdoing. They are designed to help readers understand commonly reported concerns, risk indicators, and publicly available information.

2. Research Methodology

When preparing articles or guides, we apply a structured and repeatable research process that may include one or more of the following steps:

a) Publicly Available Information Review

We review information that is publicly accessible at the time of publication, such as:

• Official company websites

• Public terms, disclosures, and policies

• Domain registration and ownership data

• Publicly available business information

b) Regulatory & Official References

Where relevant, we review notices or publications from recognized authorities, including:

• Financial and consumer regulators

• Government agencies

• Law enforcement or public advisory bodies

References are used for context and awareness, not as legal conclusions.

c) User-Reported Experiences

We may review patterns of user-reported experiences shared publicly on:

• Consumer forums

• Review platforms

• Public discussion boards and social media

Individual user statements are treated as unverified personal accounts and are never presented as established facts.

d) Risk Indicator Analysis

Rather than making claims or determinations, we focus on identifying commonly recognized risk indicators, such as:

• Lack of transparency

• Inconsistent or unclear disclosures

• Patterns frequently cited in consumer warnings

The presence of risk indicators does not imply wrongdoing or intent.

3. Language & Presentation Standards

We apply editorial standards designed to ensure fairness and neutrality:

• No absolute claims or guarantees

• No assertions of intent or guilt

• No personalized allegations

• Use of conditional, contextual, and informational language

Content is reviewed to ensure it reflects analysis and awareness, not conclusions.

4. Sources We May Reference

Sources used across our content may include:

• Official regulatory publications

• Public government resources

• Reputable news outlets

• Industry research and safety reports

• Public domain and archival records

• User-generated content clearly identified as such

We aim to rely on multiple sources where possible and to update content if material changes occur.

5. Accuracy, Updates & Corrections

Information may evolve over time due to:

• Regulatory updates

• Platform changes

• New publicly available information

We reserve the right to:

• Update articles for accuracy or clarity

• Correct factual errors

• Add contextual updates where appropriate

We welcome evidence-based correction requests submitted in good faith.

6. Editorial Independence

Jayen-Consulting operates independently.

• We are not affiliated with, sponsored by, or acting on behalf of platforms or entities discussed

• Editorial decisions are made without external influence

• Content is not created to target, harm, or discredit specific individuals or organisations

Any consulting or recovery-related services are separate from editorial content and subject to independent assessment and engagement terms.

7. Reader Responsibility

Readers are encouraged to:

• Conduct their own independent research

• Seek qualified professional advice where appropriate

• Use content as a starting point for awareness, not a final determination

Our content should not be relied upon as the sole basis for decision-making.

8. Transparency & Right of Reply

We support transparency and constructive engagement.

If you believe content:

• Is inaccurate

• Lacks context

• Requires clarification

You may contact us to request a review or provide additional information. Requests are assessed objectively and in good faith.

9. Contact Information

For methodology questions, corrections, or content review requests, contact:

📧 Email: contact@jayen-consulting.com
📍 Address: 128 City Road, London, United Kingdom, EC1V 2NX